Phytochemical Screening of Crude Bark extracts of Tecoma stans Linn. (Bignoniaceae).

 

C. Das1*, A. Mohanty1, S. Dash2, D.C. Sahoo3, N.S.K. Choudhury4, V.J. Patro5 and S.K. Kanungo2.

*1The Pharmaceutical College, Barpali, Bargarh, Orissa, India -768 029;

2Institute of Pharmacy and Technology, Salipur, Cuttack, Orissa, India -754 202;

3Dadhichi College of Pharmacy, Vidya vihar, Cuttack, Orissa, India  -754 001;

4S.C.B. Medical College, Ranihat, Cuttack- 753 007, Orissa, India;

5College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mohuda, Berhampur-760 007, Orissa, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: chandan_cognosy@yahoo.co.in

 

ABSTRACT

The paper presents the physicochemical studies of bark of Tecoma stans Linn. a traditional medicinal plant of which organoleptic, and physicochemical properties have been studied. The present study will provide the information in respect of its identification.

 

KEYWORDS: Tecoma stans Linn. Bark, Physico-chemical, Fluorescence, phytochemical.

 


INTRODUCTION:

Tecoma stans Linn. is a shrub or small tree. It is a Central and South American tree that grows to 25 ft. leaves are  opposite, odd-pinnate, up to 20 cm in length; barklets 5 or 7 in number, lanceolate to oblong-lanceolate, 6-13 cm long, long and slenderly acuminate, base acute or acuminate, margins sharply serrate. The twigs are green, turning brown, and the older bark is light gray and very furrowed. Its primary applications have been in treating diabetes and digestive problem [1]. Extracts from Tecoma stans Linn. leaf have been found to inhibit the growth of the yeast infection. Flower infusion can be taken orally for diabetes and stomach pains [2]. A strong flower and root decoction is taken orally as a diuretic, to treat syphilis or for intestinal worms. The plant is considered in the Satara District an effective remedy for snake and rats bites and for scorpion sting, diuretic, vermifuge and tonic [3]. Flower and bark have some medicinal value for the treatment of various cancer. The phytochemical report on Tecoma stans Linn. indicates that the plant contain triterpenes, hydrocarbons, resins and a volatile oil. The leaf contains flavonoid, the alkaloids, tecomine and tecostidine. It was observed that the extracts of stem bark generally showed better antimicrobial activity than those of the leaves and some organisms were selectively more sensitive to the extracts than others [4]. The flower contains β-carotene and zeaxantin[5].

 

The present investigation has been undertaken with an objective to establish physicoparameters standards for Tecoma stans Linn. bark so that authentic plant material could be explored properly for its traditional claims.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The fresh bark of Tecoma stans Linn.  were collected in the month of September (2008) from Bargarh, Orissa, India. These were identified, confirmed and authenticated by Prof.P.Jayaraman, PARC, Chennai. The voucher specimen was given the No.PARC/2007/83.Collected fresh bark were washed and used to evaluate physiochemical parameters.. The powder of dried bark was used for the determination ash values, extractive values and phytochemical investigations. All chemicals and reagents used for testing were analytical grade obtained from SD Fine Chemicals, Mumbai (India).

 

Extraction

The powdered material was extracted successively with petroleum ether (60-80°), ethyl acetate, chloroform and methanol by using soxhlet apparatus. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure which gave light yellow, green, deep green, dark brown, colored residue for petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, chloroform, and methalonic and extract respectively. The extracts were concentrated under vacuum at 40-60°c which yields a residue (4.2w/w, 3.5w/w, 10.24%w/w 16.78w/w, 14.5w/w) which were stored in a desiccators at room temperature [6]

 

Physico-chemical parameters

Percentage of total ash, acid-insoluble ash, water soluble ash and sulphated ash were calculated as per the Indian Pharmacopoeia[7].The total ash of the powdered bark was tested for different inorganic constituents[8]. Different extracts of the bark were prepared for the study of extractive values [9]. Fluorescence analysis of powdered bark was carried out by standard methods [10, 11].

 

Preliminary phytochemical analysis

For the preliminary phytochemical analysis, 5 g powdered drug was extracted with petroleum ether (60-80), ethyl acetate, chloroform, methanol and water successively. The extracts were dried and weighed. The presence or absence of different phytoconstituents viz. triterpenoids, steroids, alkaloids, sugars, tannins, glycosides and flavonoids, etc. were detected by usual prescribed methods [12, 13] .

 

Table 1. Behavior of bark powder of Tecoma stans Linn. With different chemical reagents.

Sl No.

Acid/ reagent

Observation

1

powder as such

light brown

2

Powder + picric acid

yellow

3

Powder + con. Nitric acid

red

4

Powder + con. Hydrochloric acid

light green

4

Powder + con. Sulphuric acid

brown

6

Powder + Glacial acetic acid

colorless

7

Powder + 5% Ferric chloride solution (aqueous)

green

8

Powder + Sodium hydroxide(5N)

yellow

9

Powder + Potassium hydroxide (5%)

light yellow

10

Powder + Iodine/20

red

 

Table 2.Ash Value Tecoma stans Linn.bark

Type of ash

%w/w (Mean±SEM)

Total ash

7.55±0.167

Acid insoluble ash

1.76±0.062

water soluble ash

4.41±0.071

Sulphated ash

6.45±0.256

Mean value of six readings

 

Table 3. Extractive values of Tecoma stans Linn. bark with different solvents.

Types of solvent

% Extractability (Mean±SEM)

Petroleum ether

2.6±0.05

Benzene

0.24±0.02

Ethyl acetate

1.26±0.07

Chloroform

1.63±0.04

Methanol

6.28±0.07

Water

2.53±0.05

Mean value of six readings

 

RESULTS

Behavior of bark powder with different chemical reagents

Behavior of bark powder of Tecoma stans Linn. with different chemical reagents were performed to detect the occurrence of phytoconstituents along with color changes under ordinary daylight by standard method which is tabulated in Table1

 

 

Physico-chemical study

The percentage of total ash, acid-insoluble ash, water soluble ash, sulphated ash and different extractives are tabulated in Table 2 and 3. The qualitative analysis of ash indicated presence of calcium, aluminum, potassium, chlorides and sulphates.

 

Fluorescence characteristics

When physical and chemical parameters are inadequate as it often happens with the powdered drugs, the plant material may be identified from their adulterants on basis of fluorescence study of different extract and powdered drug which is tabulated in Tables 4 and 5.

 

Table 4 Fluorescence analysis of different solvent extract of Tecoma stans Linn. bark under UV and visible light  

  Extract

Visible light

UV

Short wave

Long wave

Petroleum  extract (60-80°C)

Visible light

Short wave

Long wave

Chloroform extract

 

yellowish green

greenish black

Ethyl acetate extract

light yellow

green

greenish brown

Methanol extract

yellowish green

light green

black

Petroleum extract (60-80°C)

light brown

green

dark brown

 

Preliminary phytochemical analysis

The preliminary phytochemical analysis of bark extracts of petroleum ether (60-80°C), ethyl acetate, chloroform, methanol and water is tabulated in Table 6.

 

DISCUSSION

The water soluble ash is almost half of total ash and twice of acid insoluble ash. The alcohol soluble extractive value is more than any other extractive value indicating the solubility of phytoconstituents in alcohol. The fluorescence analysis of powder and extract indicate the any fluorescent phytoconstituent present or adulterants. Preliminary phytochemical analysis indicates the nature of phytoconstituents present in different solvent extract. This also indicates that the methanol extract have more number of phytoconstituent than any other extracts i.e.  Carbohydrates, alkaloids, glycosides, phytosterol, saponin flavonoids and phenolics. These are few of the important physico-chemical characters of the bark.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors sincerely thanks to the principal and management of The Pharmaceutical College, Barpali, Bargarh for providing all the facilities to carry out the study and special thanks to Prof. P. Jayaraman (PARC) Chennai, for providing the information about plant.

 

Table 5. Fluorescence analysis   of bark powder of Tecoma stans Linn. with different chemical reagents.

Reagent

Colour in day light

Short wave UV

Long wave UV

Powder as such

Light brown

No change

Dark brown

Powder+1 N NaOH in Methanol

Light green

Green

Yellowish green

Powder+1 N NaOH

Yellowish green

Green

Deep brown

Powder+ Ethanol

Colorless

Colorless

Colorless

Powder+ HNO3+NH3 sol.

Light green

Light green

Brown

Powder+50% HNO3

Light green

Green

Brown

Powder + 1 N HCl

Colorless

Colorless

Light brown

Powder+HCl

Light green

Light green

Brown

Powder+H2SO4

Deep brown

Black

Black

Powder+50% H2SO4

Light green

Green

Brown

Powder+glacial acid

Colorless

Colorless

Light brown

Powder+HNO3

Light yellow

Light green

blue

 


Table 6. Qualitative phytochemical analysis of various extracts of Tecoma stans   Linn. bark

 

Types of constituent

Petroleum ether

Ethyl acetate

Chloroform

Methanol

Water

Alkaloid

-

-

-

+

+

Carbohydrate and glycoside

-

+

+

+

+

Saponin

-

+

-

+

+

Protein

-

-

-

-

-

Sterol

+

+

+

+

+

Fixed oils and fats

+

-

+

-

-

Phenolic compounds and flavonoids

-

-

+

+

-

Gums and mucilage

-

-

-

-

-


+→ Indicates the presence of phytoconstituent. -→ Indicates the presence of phytoconstituent.


REFERENCES:

1.       Kiritikar KR and Basu BD. Indian Medicinal Plants, International Book Distributor, Dehradun. 2006.

2.       Costantino L, Raimondi L, Pirisino R and  Brunetti T. Isolation and pharmacological activities of the Tecoma stans Linn. alkaloids. Farmaco, 2003; 58:781-785.

3.       Thangadurai D. Ethnomedicinal plants used as antidote for poisonous bites among the tribals of southern Western Ghats, India,1998. National Conference on Recent Trends in Spice and Medicinal Plant Research, Calcutta, WB, India.

4.       Binuti OA and Lajubutu BA. Antimicrobial potentials of some plant species of the Bignoniaceae family. Afr J Med Med Sci, 1994; 23:269-273.

5.       Srivastava BK and Reddy MVRK. Flavonoids from the flower extract of Tecoma stans. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 1995; 7: 679-680.

6.        Houghton, Peter, Raman and Amala. Laboratory handbook for the fractionation of natural extracts. Springer, Berlin. 1998.

7.       Anonymous. Pharmacopoeia of India. Ministry of Health, controller of publications. New Delhi.1966.

8.       Anonymous. Pharmacopoeia of India. Ministry of Health, controller of publications. New Delhi. 1966.

9.       Wallis TE. Practical Pharmacognosy, J. and A. Churchill Ltd, London. 1953.

10.     Pratt RJ and Chase CR. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to development of a system of identification. J. Am. Pharm. Ass, 1949; 38: 324-333.

11.     Kokosk JI, Kokoski R and Salma FJ. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs under ultraviolet radiation. J. Am. Pharm. Ass, 1958; 47: 715-717.

12.     Kokate CK, Purohit AP and Gokhale SB. Pharmacognosy. Nirali Prakashan, Pune. 2004.

13.     Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods, Chapman and Hall, London. 1998.

 

 


 

 

Received on 11.06.2009       Modified on 13.08.2009

Accepted on 10.09.2009      © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech.2 (4): Oct.-Dec. 2009; Page 816-818